Slaughterhouse-Five Essay: Irony, Dark Humor, and Satire :: Slaughterhouse-Five Essays

Irony, Dark Humor, and Satire in Slaughterhouse-Five    Kurt Vonnegut uses a combination of dark humor and sarcasm in Slaughterhouse-Five. As a result, the novel enables the lector to realize the horrors of war while simultaneously laughing at some of the absurd situations it can generate. Mostly, Vonnegut wants the reader to recognize the fact that iodine has to accept things as they happen because no one can change the inevitable. Although Slaughterhouse-Five may not be filled with charming satire and comical scenes, there are accounts which the force the reader to laugh. In one instance, an extremely drunk Billy Pilgrim is searching desperately for the steering roll of his car He was in the backseat of his car, which is why he couldnt find the steering wheel, Vonnegut writes (47). In another episode, Billy becomes unstuck in time while watch television, so that he sees a war film backwards and then forwards. The most humorous sequence takes place when Billy trav els from the zoo on Tralfamadore to his hook up with night with his wife, Valencia. He wakes up to find himself in the German prison camp. He then finds himself back with Valencia after returning from the bathroom. He goes to sleep, then wakes up on a train on the way to his fathers funeral. In any case, the reader encounters much dark humor in the novel. There is a intellect of an embittered humor with the Tralfamadorian phrase, So it goes, which is repeated over 100 times in the novel. John May says that Vonneguts purpose in repeating the phrase after each(prenominal) statement of death is to build its meaning with each incremental refrain (Contemporary Literary Criticism 8 530). At first, the saying can be looked upon as funny in an ironic way. However, as one reads further, the phrase becomes irritating and irreverent. The reader cannot fathom so many deaths meaning so little. According t o Wayne McGinnis, it is most likely Vonneguts intent to cause such feelings from the rea der (Contemporary Literary Criticism 5 468). This punctuating phrase forces the reader to look at the novels deaths one after the other. Ultimately, the repetition creates a feeling of resentment that too many people are killed. The saying is a grim reminder that means on the dot the opposite of what its words say. Vonnegut ends the novel with the reminder of the deaths of JFK, Martin Luther King, and all of those that died in Vietnam.